DSALTA Blog

What Is the Difference Between Third-Party and Vendor Risk Management?

Written by

Ogulcan Ozdemir

|

Product Marketing Manager

Published on

Aug 8, 2025

Table of Contents

TPRM and VRM

You've heard both terms thrown around in meetings: TPRM and Vendor Risk Management. Your IT team talks about third-party risks, and procurement about vendor assessments. But are they the same? Understanding the differences is key to protecting your organization from unseen risks. This guide clarifies how these approaches work together for complete external risk protection.

Understanding Vendor Risk Management (VRM): The Foundation

Vendor Risk Management (VRM) focuses on identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks from your paid commercial suppliers and service providers—the companies you pay for goods or services. VRM manages typical vendor relationships, emphasizing contracts, service level agreements, and procurement risks.

Key points of VRM include:

  • Focus on paid commercial relationships

  • Emphasis on contracts and service levels

  • Supply chain risk focus

  • Formal onboarding and assessments

  • Performance monitoring

Vendor relationships give you more control through contracts and the ability to terminate for non-compliance.

Demystifying Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM): The Bigger Picture

TPRM covers a broader range of external business relationships beyond vendors, including partners, contractors, regulatory bodies, and more. It recognizes risks from any external entity accessing your systems or data, paid or not.

TPRM covers:

  • Strategic partners and joint ventures

  • Consultants and contractors

  • Regulatory agencies

  • Technology integrators and channel partners

  • Customers with system access

  • Acquired companies during mergers

Managing TPRM is complex due to limited contractual control over many relationships.

The Critical Differences That Matter

The core difference lies in scope and control. Vendor Risk Management (VRM) hones in on commercial vendors with clear contracts, while Third Party Risk Management (TPRM) encompasses all external relationships, formal and informal alike.

Control levels differ significantly: vendors usually provide contractual leverage—including audit rights, service level agreements, and termination clauses. Broader third parties such as strategic partners or regulators often lack such contractual controls, requiring more nuanced, diplomatic risk management.

Assessment approaches vary: VRM focuses on financial viability, service delivery, compliance, and supply chain risks. TPRM demands tailored, multi-dimensional evaluation, addressing strategic value, political factors, and limited assessment rights.

Implementing VRM is typically straightforward, integrated with procurement and contract management. By contrast, TPRM requires enterprise-wide coordination, cross-functional governance, varied assessment processes, and integration into larger risk frameworks.

Why Both Are Essential for Complete Protection

Starting with VRM often makes sense due to its clarity and easier implementation, but relying solely on VRM leaves significant blind spots. TPRM extends protection to complex and non-traditional relationships VRM doesn't cover, such as strategic partners with sensitive data access or regulatory bodies that cannot be audited or dismissed.

Real-world scenarios highlight these gaps:

  • A strategic partner with deep intellectual property access suffers a breach—TPRM steps in where VRM cannot.

  • Regulatory agencies requiring access for compliance pose challenges that VRM isn't designed to manage.

  • In mergers and acquisitions, diverse third-party ecosystems necessitate a TPRM approach for effective integration.

Combined, these programs provide a holistic risk management posture essential for modern businesses.

Building an Integrated Risk Management Strategy

Effective risk management begins with establishing a strong VRM foundation: standardized processes for assessing vendors, scoring risks, monitoring vendor performance, and integrating tightly with procurement workflows.

As maturity grows, gradually expand to full TPRM coverage by identifying all third-party relationships beyond traditional vendors, developing tailored assessment frameworks for each, establishing cross-functional governance for varied risks, and defining risk tolerances by category.

This progression enables manageable implementation while evolving toward comprehensive external risk control.

Technology and Common Implementation Mistakes to Avoid

Modern risk management requires technology platforms that support the full spectrum of VRM and TPRM needs: from automated vendor onboarding and contract management for VRM, to flexible assessment frameworks, cross-relationship risk mapping, and multi-stakeholder approval workflows for TPRM.

Common mistakes include treating VRM and TPRM as completely separate programs with no coordination, underestimating the complexity and governance demands of TPRM, ignoring dependencies between third parties that create concentrated risks, and applying a one-size-fits-all assessment approach that fails to address different relationship nuances.

Equally critical is stakeholder engagement across departments—IT, procurement, legal, compliance, and executive leadership. Success depends on integrating perspectives and authority for comprehensive external risk control.

The Future of External Risk Management and Making the Right Choice

Looking forward, the integration of AI-powered relationship discovery, predictive analytics, real-time risk scoring, and cyber threat intelligence into TPRM and VRM will redefine external risk management in 2025 and beyond. Organizations mastering both approaches will gain competitive advantages by proactively managing complex ecosystems.

Choosing between VRM and TPRM isn't binary. Start with VRM if you are new to external risk management, have resource constraints, or focus primarily on supply chain risks. Expand to TPRM to cover complex partnerships, regulated industries, or when VRM maturity allows. Many organizations run both programs simultaneously for comprehensive coverage.

The key message: act now. Proactive risk leadership enables growth, innovation, and resilient partnerships. Waiting only leaves your organization vulnerable.

Your Path to Comprehensive External Risk Protection

Start today with DSALTA’s powerful Vendor Risk Management platform — add up to 10 vendors for free and experience how effortless risk monitoring can be. Book a demo now and see how DSALTA helps you build trust, reduce risk, and onboard vendors smarter.

Eliminate all risks, get compliant and build trust, in light-speed.

Simplify TPRM by uniting risk and compliance in DSALTA’s all-in-one platform.

Eliminate all risks, get compliant and build trust, in light-speed.

Simplify TPRM by uniting risk and compliance in DSALTA’s all-in-one platform.

Eliminate all risks, get compliant and build trust, in light-speed.

Simplify TPRM by uniting risk and compliance in DSALTA’s all-in-one platform.

Eliminate all risks, get compliant and build trust, in light-speed.

Simplify TPRM by uniting risk and compliance in DSALTA’s all-in-one platform.